Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
The jury rendered guilty verdicts because pertinent information was deliberately withheld and the statutes were misstated.

The Fifth Circuit said this case was primarily about "credibility", but is there anyone, in their right mind, who still finds Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila "credible" (with the possible exception of his own mother)...?? If so, who....?? If Johnny Sutton had to do it over again, do you honestly think that he would still sign that immunity deal with Aldrete-Davila...? No way. OAD has proven that he can't be trusted. And if the prosecutor can't trust him, then that prosecutor has no right to tell a jury to believe him.

138 posted on 07/31/2008 1:02:57 AM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Cyropaedia
The jury rendered guilty verdicts because pertinent information was deliberately withheld and the statutes were misstated.

Those were issues for appeal, and the appeals court finds no merit in those claims. This is a matter of opinion, but I find it easier to trust the opinion of three highly experienced appeals court judges who had complete access to all the information and briefs.

139 posted on 07/31/2008 11:33:14 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson