Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another emergency for Qantas
News.com.au ^ | July 29, 2008 12:00am

Posted on 07/28/2008 9:30:06 AM PDT by Perdogg

QANTAS'S reputation as the world's safest airline took another blow last night with a passenger jet forced to make an emergency landing after an undercarriage door failed to close.

The Boeing 767-338 flying from Melbourne to Adelaide was forced to turn around 20 minutes after it took off at 5.40pm and make an emergency landing at 6.15pm.

The incident came only three days after a Qantas Boeing 747-400 was forced to make an emergency landing in Manila after a gaping hole was found its fuselage.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; quantas

1 posted on 07/28/2008 9:30:06 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

What the heck is going on? Are they hiring third world mechanics like U.S. airlines do? I always thought very highly of Quantas.


2 posted on 07/28/2008 9:39:07 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
It wasn't too long ago, the world was treated to the spectre of one-after-another nightclub bombings in Australia.

It's curious, no doubts.

3 posted on 07/28/2008 9:46:41 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

There was a union despute going on, and lots of jobs were cut...could it be sabotage?

http://business.theage.com.au/business/qantas-slashes-1500-jobs-20080718-3h71.html


4 posted on 07/28/2008 9:59:38 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I don’t understand why they aborted. A landing gear door shouldn’t be a big deal. It may add a little drag to the airspeed that may cause the flight to use a little more gas and take a few minutes longer to get to its destination.

I’m all for safety, but this sounds like a little bit of an overreaction by the crew.


5 posted on 07/28/2008 10:34:55 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Years ago, I read an article that explained that the reason why no airline runs ads about its safety record is that most accidents are caused by unpredictable things that could strike any airline so even the safest airline could suffer problems unexpectedly, making its ad campaign look foolish.
6 posted on 07/28/2008 10:35:51 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

http://youtube.com/watch?v=kJZQkslDBjM


7 posted on 07/28/2008 10:39:52 AM PDT by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
More than likely company SOP and depending on which door it was there could have been quite a bit of drag and noise which could have caused panic amongst the passengers resulting in law suits for unnecessary pain and suffering and emotional distress. However, British Airways probably would have continued to press on.
8 posted on 07/28/2008 11:18:32 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

“There was a union despute going on, and lots of jobs were cut...could it be sabotage?”

Well now, that do put a different light on the subject don’t it?


9 posted on 07/28/2008 12:42:28 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

“I don’t understand why they aborted. A landing gear door shouldn’t be a big deal. It may add a little drag to the airspeed that may cause the flight to use a little more gas and take a few minutes longer to get to its destination.”

How about when they get to cruising speed it rips the door right off and it flies back and damages the rudder or elevators. Nah, nothing to worry about.


10 posted on 07/28/2008 12:44:57 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

“I hate Qantas.”


11 posted on 07/28/2008 12:45:47 PM PDT by dfwgator ( This tag blank until football season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
More than likely company SOP and depending on which door it was there could have been quite a bit of drag and noise which could have caused panic amongst the passengers resulting in law suits for unnecessary pain and suffering and emotional distress.

Well, the company SOP is a possibility, but the drag would be minimal since the doors run fore and aft. Wind noise, I'll concede, there would be some additional wind noise, but not enough to (IMO) cause panic in the cabin.

12 posted on 07/28/2008 1:03:37 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
How about when they get to cruising speed it rips the door right off and it flies back and damages the rudder or elevators. Nah, nothing to worry about.

Having been in this situation, it really isn't as bad as you think. The stresses on the door are minimal since they run fore and aft versus perpendicular to the aircraft's direction of travel. In addition, the doors are quite strong and are designed to be able to withstand the drag forces at cruising speeds. The likelihood is that the passengers would never know that the door was open for the entire flight. A.A.Cunningham probably hit it correctly when he suggested it was company SOP.

13 posted on 07/28/2008 1:07:33 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Maybe the oxygen bottle from the first plane flew off and hit the landing gear door from the second plane and damaged it while both were criss-crossing over Borneo.


14 posted on 07/28/2008 1:09:08 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment; A.A. Cunningham
Well, the company SOP is a possibility, but the drag would be minimal since the doors run fore and aft. Wind noise, I'll concede, there would be some additional wind noise, but not enough to (IMO) cause panic in the cabin.

As somebody who was on the flight in question, I can assure you there was a reasonable amount of noise, and also some vibration (although this was minor enough that it might have been normal - and the noise just made me unusually aware of it). No, there wasn't panic in the cabin, but there was enough noise that we knew something wasn't right, and we were quite relieved when told we were turning around.

15 posted on 07/29/2008 1:56:01 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Thanks for the input, natural. I’m glad everything turned out alright and you (presumably) got home without further incident.


16 posted on 07/29/2008 4:41:45 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

um, because the majority of their flight paths are over the pacific ocean....


17 posted on 07/29/2008 4:50:07 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson