Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saveliberty

“leaping to conclusions” isn’t limited by idology.

Besides, I was commenting on the possiblity, and the fact that an objective strategist said that is what was necessary, base upon his reading of the electorate.


76 posted on 07/28/2008 5:14:25 AM PDT by G Larry (I'm investing in "Pitchfork Futures"!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry

I like Dick Morris (sometimes) but I would not call him objective. That’s not necessarily bad, I can’t think of any strategist who is objective, left, center or right.

He does hope and try to support what he considers moderate Republicans.

That said, he has the Clintons’ number.

I think that the money issues are getting overlooked where conservatives and democrats agree (to a suprising extent, if looking as a partisan R or D).

But Powell doesn’t carry the numbers to support Morris’ point.

He might have done so in 2000 but he has had an impact on his own political fortunes.


80 posted on 07/28/2008 5:19:29 AM PDT by saveliberty (Prayer blizzard for the Snow family. Tony was a blessing unto us all. We will miss him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson