Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephanopoulos to McCain: 'I Can't Believe You Believe That'
News Busters ^ | July 28, 2008 | Brent Baker

Posted on 07/27/2008 11:10:43 PM PDT by Red Steel

On Sunday's This Week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos condemned John McCain for charging that “Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.” Stephanopoulos, who interviewed McCain on Saturday at his Arizona ranch, declared: “I can't believe you believe that.” McCain insisted “I'm not questioning his patriotism. I'm questioning his actions. I'm questioning his lack, total lack of understanding,” leading Stephanopoulos to counter: “But that is questioning his patriotism. When you say someone would rather lose a war, a candidate, that's questioning his honor, his decency, his character.”

As McCain continued to defend his assessment, Stephanopoulos kept rejecting his reasoning (“So putting lives at risk for a political campaign, you believe he's doing that?”) and excoriating his characterization of Obama: “But you're questioning his motives.”

Stephanopoulos matched a theme pushed on Wednesday's World News by ABC reporter David Wright. My July 23 NewsBusters item recounted:

Wright began his interview with McCain by scolding him for his “extraordinary statement” that “Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.” Wright demanded: “Do you really think he's that craven?” Wright also lectured: “But what you seem to be saying there is that it's all about personal ambition for him and not about what he honestly thinks is right for the country.”

The exchange on the Sunday, July 27 This Week in the interview taped the day before in Arizona, with McCain's dogs walking around them at least once:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You've taken heat this week with your comments saying that Senator Obama would rather lose a war than win a political campaign. I can't believe you believe that.

JOHN McCAIN: Well, I'm not questioning his patriotism. I'm questioning his actions. I'm questioning his lack, total lack of understanding.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But that is questioning his patriotism. When you say someone would rather lose a war, a candidate, that's questioning his honor, his decency, his character.

McCAIN: All I'm say something is, and I will repeat, he does not understand. I'm not questioning his patriotism. I am saying that he made the decision which was political in order to help him get the nomination.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So putting lives at risk for a political campaign, you believe he's doing that?

McCAIN: I believe that when he said that we had to leave Iraq and we had to be out by last March and we had to have a date certain, that was in contravention to and still is to the Chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General David Petraeus. When he never asked to sit down for a briefing with General Petraeus, our commander on the ground, when he waited 900 days to go back again where young American lives are on the line, I think that's a fundamental lack of understanding and I think the American people will make the appropriate choices.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But you're questioning his motives.

McCAIN: I say that it was very clear that a decision had to be made, and I made it when it wasn't popular. He made a decision which was popular with his base, and that is a fundamental difference and he does not understand and did not understand and still doesn't understand that the surge was the vital strategy in us not having to lose a war, chaos, genocide, increased influence of Iranians in the region, the consequences of failure would have been severe. Now the benefits are enormous of a stable ally in the region, of a country that is a friend of ours, a break on Iranian influence, certainly a break on al Qaeda and other jihadist organizations. So he made the decision that that was the best way to go to get the nomination of his party.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biasmeanslayoffs; clintonista; clintonopoulos; drivebymedia; iraq; iraqsurge; liberalmedia; mccain; mediabias; obama; propagandawingofdnc; trysellingthetruth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: Caipirabob

Thank you for the Welcome! I thought this more than appropriate until November 4th and hopefully it goes in the hopper on November 5th after John McCain’s Victory and America’s Victory over Mediocrity, Anti-Americanism, Traitorous Behavior, Anti-Militarism, Socialism/Communism, and Muslim Govermental Takeover! :-)


101 posted on 07/28/2008 10:39:35 AM PDT by NOBAMA in 08 (An Empty Suited Opportunist with No Redeeming Value!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
McCain insisted “I'm not questioning his patriotism. I'm questioning his actions. I'm questioning his lack, total lack of understanding,”

McCain...always being way too charitable to liberal... would have been far better off not responding to the baiting of Stephanopolis at all.

Just stonewall him.

Force Stephanopolis to budge or just walk out.

102 posted on 07/28/2008 10:40:11 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

“Do you work for the RNC?”

No, I donot at this time, but I did visit John McCain’s local headquarters today along with my local Congresssional Reps and I did volunteer to do whatever I could for the remaining few month to help and asist as much as possible to help with Victory for America on November 4th and that means the Defeat of the DEMORATS and their Traitorous of Late! :-)


103 posted on 07/28/2008 10:46:24 AM PDT by NOBAMA in 08 (An Empty Suited Opportunist with No Redeeming Value!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Amen!


104 posted on 07/28/2008 10:56:21 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

And, time to question Stephanopoulos’ motives in the exchange. Is he Obama’s love slave or what?


105 posted on 07/28/2008 11:30:30 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NOBAMA in 08
And which committee do you work for?

Remember, you have some people here who are not satisified with McCain because he will not renounce fascist methods of government written into American legislation, nor will he renounce the failed "McCain-Feingold" anti-freespeech legislation.

McCain will get our support only after he becomes an American!

106 posted on 07/28/2008 11:34:54 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

” I wouldn’t expect you to agree with my assertion. You spent years shilling for a proven liar in order to feather your political and professional nest. And what did the liar do to reward you? He pleasured himself in your sink.”


107 posted on 07/28/2008 11:59:06 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I think you missed my point. I was saying that we have a “girlie man” attitude in this nation today; unlike the days when there were real men like Wayne and Bronson.


108 posted on 07/28/2008 12:15:13 PM PDT by no dems (99% of the Politicians give all the others a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

There are some people that are never satisfied with anything! Looks like you must be exstatic over Osama Obama Hussein, he wants to change everything! John McCain is 1000 Times the American you will ever be. before going Bananas, I am assuming you are one of the Greatest Americans to ever tread on Our Hallowed American Earth. After all, You tell us on your home page that you are one of few gifted Elites in the Postal Service that passed judgment on all others in the postal Service, if I interpreted your musings correctly.:-P


109 posted on 07/28/2008 1:16:27 PM PDT by NOBAMA in 08 (An Empty Suited Opportunist with No Redeeming Value!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: NOBAMA in 08
Yahooo! Bravo! My hat is off to you. And thank you.

An Obama Presidency is not acceptable on the grounds the man is simply not Presidential Material, except he might be good as a cast member for The West Wing

And you are actually, real-time doing something to ensure Obama doesn't get to bring an overboring, leftwing, world of the lotus-eaters' "dramatic" make-believe TV serial from crossing over and into the lines of reality; the real world of real consequences.

110 posted on 07/28/2008 2:47:39 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Why can’t we question his patriotism? Is there some law that says that a person can’t have his patriotism questioned?


111 posted on 07/30/2008 5:04:55 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson