Thus, we undertake a critical consideration of the way in which contemporary liberal political theory regards values as the only meaningful level of pluralism, construes this putative fact as giving rise to a host of problems, and then, in response, imposes its presupposed solutions. In response, we call for a radical, multi-dimensional pluralism; we choose the pluralisation of democracy over the liberal project to protect democracy through normative principles. ...
And when even your “summary” contains such meaningless tripe, the paper actually contain .... what?
(I cannot even tell what “Coultorism” IS, much less whether this writer thinks it is a good thong (er, thing) or a bad thong.)