In fairness, while it is guilty of modern academia’s obfuscation-by-verbosity-and-jargon, the article IS giving SOME credit to Coulter and stating pretty clearly (from my meager skimmings) that Coulter and movement conservatism infuriate liberals PRECISELY because she/it do not conform to liberal prejudices and that movement conservatism has some legitimate critiques of liberalism.
Now, of course, they present it in an unappealing manner but it’s not pure invective against Coulter or movement conservatism.
“... the article IS giving SOME credit to Coulter and stating pretty clearly (from my meager skimmings) that Coulter and movement conservatism infuriate liberals PRECISELY because she/it do not conform to liberal prejudices and that movement conservatism has some legitimate critiques of liberalism.”
In fact, the author quite strongly acknowledges that “Coulterism” exposes the internal inconsistencies of liberalism. His only solution to keep the charade going is to use Ann’s tactics of polemics and satire against her (it).