[mkjessup]

Czar Fenty and his Commies on the D.C. Council need to be frog marched down to Lorton Virginia for a spell while a special master is appointed to run the D.C. regime.

Not that I’m holding my breath.

[goldstategop]

Ignore an unconstitutional law. Civil disobedience is called for. DC Thug Fenty and his cops don't have enough prison space to jail every DC resident seeking to exercise their rights.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[G.Mason]

Slaves have no need for guns.

Their owners provide for their welfare.

Vote Smart ... stay informed

[Shooter 2.5]

“Murder is the only statistic that all agencies are required to report. Consequently some agencies particularly in Illinois do not report all the crimes. If components are missing the total is adjusted to “0.”

I’ll bet Chicago and King daley are lying through their teeth as to how safe the city is.

[RoadKingSE]

You would think that Mayor Adrian Fenty would want to ensure that the District's residents would have the means to protect themselves.

With that need for protection in mind Fenty decided his best choice for Police Chief would be a GIRL. A girl who sued the department repeatedly for sexual discrimination and was promoted to shut her up. (:^o)

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

Leftists are relentless in their march to destroy our rights and create a marxist utopia.

[Erik Latranyi]

DC is hoping it takes another 30 years for these “new” rules to be challenged all the way up to the Supreme Court.

This is going to be the liberal tactic....stall, obfuscate, block and violate the edges of the ruling in hopes liberal judges can chip away at it over time, leaving you with a right to keep and bear arms only in your home and nowhere else.....and if you live up to impossible standards.

[sergeantdave]

So who voted these yahoos and neanderthals into office? Blame them.

[Still Thinking]

The Supreme Court has recognized that the primary purpose of the Second Amendment is to establish the individual's right to keep a weapon for self-defense, yet the new D.C. law practically destroys the ability to exercise that right by forcing an individual to load, unlock, or assemble their weapon only after a threat is already present.

I thought the lock provision was one of the things explicitly struck down (and ridiculed) in Heller. Am I mistaken?