[ConservaTexan]

I didn’t say that something inherent in marijuana use led to this woman’s death. She chose to use drugs, got busted, then died trying to cut a deal to lessen her sentence. Whether it was choosing to use illegal drugs or agreeing to set up the people that sell her illegal drugs, she made a bad choice and died because of it.

[dragnet2]

agreeing to set up the people that sell her illegal drugs, she made a bad choice and died because of it.

Do you think law enforcement taking some stupid female, that was busted for pot, and using her for drug buys was a safe thing for law enforcement to do?

And if pot possession is so bad, why would the courts and law enforcement bait some ignorant young 23 year old female to lure complete strangers into drug buys.

Ya think they trained and allowed this foolish youngster to be armed before doing their bidding to go in and buy firearms and drugs from strangers?

[I see my hands]

"I didn’t say that something inherent in marijuana use led to this woman’s death. She chose to use drugs, got busted, then died trying to cut a deal to lessen her sentence. Whether it was choosing to use illegal drugs or agreeing to set up the people that sell her illegal drugs, she made a bad choice and died because of it."

That's not true. In your post #19 you specifically pointed to using pot as having negative consequences. And the consequence we are talking about in this case is her death. In fact there is nothing about pot that led to this woman's death. Only it's prohibition.

It's also not true that she died trying to cut a deal. She died in the execution of a sting she was coerced into.

[greccogirl]

No, WE bad a bad choice for giving a young woman four years unless she did something she wasn’t trained to do, and having pot a criminal offense in the first damn place.

They’ll be paying her family a load of money.