Posted on 07/23/2008 4:34:36 PM PDT by tcg
South Dakota is only the first State to pass such legislation. many must follow. The legislation was well drafted and supported by a record of legislative findings of fact that includes unassailable medical science which unequivocally affirms that children in the womb are, in fact, human beings and therefore persons.
The legislation had and still has overwhelming popular support. That is why it survived efforts by pro-choice (read pro-feticide) extremists to defeat it through a referendum.
Several other States are now said to be ready to follow this example.
Some within the pro-life community have speculated that such a courageous act by a State legislature is ill conceived. I have heard the arguments that the incremental approach stands a better chance and that somehow the South Dakota approach will harm the inevitable incremental curtailing of abortions.
I say nonsense!
Human Rights activism always requires an asymmetrical approach. The choice is not either/or, it is always both/and.
I have long supported incremental efforts geared toward the limitations and curtailment of abortion. I was a practicing pro-life lawyer for a very long time. For seven years in the last decade I led the American Center for Law and Justice which used such incrementalism in securing the protection of pro-life speech.
However, pitting these complimentary strategies against one another is wrong. It also fails to comprehend the gravity of the moral evil that is legal abortion.
That is why I have now chosen to use a new term to characterize my own opposition to legal abortion. It is time for a new abolitionism. It is time to end abortion!
(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...
Ditto!
Awesome post. Thank you Humble Servant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.