Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: According2RecentPollsAirIsGood
I remember how the media elites reacted to the comedy of Team America(!).

Jim Emerson: On celebrities, Politics, and movie critics (shilling for Roger Ebert) (Chicago Sun Times October 14, 2004 Jim Emerson, Editor of RogerEbert.com)

Q. Ebert didn't like "Team America: World Police" (1 star) because it makes fun of all sides and he's obviously a liberal.

A.That's assigning motives that aren't supported by the review itself. Ebert wrote: "If I were asked to extract a political position from the movie, I'd be baffled. It is neither for nor against the war on terrorism, just dedicated to ridiculing those who wage it and those who oppose it. The White House gets a free pass, since the movie seems to think Team America makes its own policies without political direction.

"I wasn't offended by the movie's content so much as by its nihilism. At a time when the world is in crisis and the country faces an important election, the response of Parker, Stone and company is to sneer at both sides -- indeed, at anyone who takes the current world situation seriously. They may be right that some of us are puppets, but they're wrong that all of us are fools, and dead wrong that it doesn't matter."

Now go back and look at Ebert's review of "South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut," where he makes similar criticisms. Perhaps a more likely explanation for his opinion is that he finds fault with these particular filmmakers' scattershot approach to comedy. (And one's sense of humor is even more personal than one's politics.) This paragraph from Ebert's "South Park" review in 1999 is remarkably consistent with his criticism of "Team America": "All it lacks is a point to its message. What is it saying? That movies have gone too far, or that protests against movies have gone too far? It is a sign of our times that I cannot tell. Perhaps it's simply anarchistic, and feels that if it throws enough shocking material at the wall, some of it will stick. A lot of the movie offended me. Some of it amazed me. It is too long and runs out of steam, but it serves as a signpost for our troubled times..."

Read the full article above. This is an excerpt of the longer discussion of why it was "wrong" (politically incorrect).
89 posted on 07/23/2008 1:25:00 PM PDT by weegee (Obama loves America like Bill loves Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
Exactly how intelligent does one have to be when Eberts only job in life was to get fat, watch movies and bitch about something he is totally incapable of doing?
97 posted on 07/23/2008 2:32:27 PM PDT by Bommer (A Third Party can win when Republicans and Democraps stand for the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson