Posted on 07/23/2008 4:54:37 AM PDT by KLFuchs
Republicans always claim the mantle of the anti-Jihadists. And for the most part, they are. But when a supporter of jihad and terrorism comes to the midst of the G.O.P., that anti-jihadist/counterterrorist mantle comes crashing down. The Republican Party simply refuses to denounce pan-Islamists in its midst...
(Excerpt) Read more at debbieschlussel.com ...
No kidding. We can’t even get everyone on the same page to defeat a possible jihadist (or a sympathizer, and at least an enabler) going for the top spot, annd that’s just here on FR.
I’d like to hit the reset button on this country, maybe reset to 1910.
People like this need to be kicked out of the GOP. Maybe more strong conservatives need to join the Dem. party, run for offices as libs and screw them up good too.
This just perpetuates the myth that the Republican Party gets to pick who’s in and who’s out of the party. Party membership is purely the choice of the individual. Obviously, who the Republican Party gives funds to is another story.
Vote from the Rooftops !
Unfortunately if we kicked out the bad apples who are holed up in the House and Senate, we'd have about an even dozen.
The GOP isn't the party for right-wing conservatives any longer. It's the party of 'reaching out' to the Democrat Party and being politically correct and ignoring the menace that the looming homosexuals pose to our nation.
It's the party that is prissy and polite to their supposedly opposite numbers and is the party that fails to recognize that Obama poses more of a threat to our security and well being that Osama does.
“People like this need to be kicked out of the GOP.”
Well, since the present Republican Administration is subsidizing Mohammedan terror in the Balkans to the tune of at least $350,000,000.00 and $500,000,000.00 in the West Bank and the Republican candidate for president has been on the payroll of Mohammedan jihadis in the Balkans for years, I’d say it is far more likely that anti-jihadis will be the ones thrown out of the GOP than those who are in the process of selling us out to Islam.
There were globalist schemers even then. A notable one was the president of Princeton.
I'm afraid the same mistakes would be made because the people are informed by a complicit news media.
Right, we can’t “keep people out” of the party but by the same token, it is how we lost control of the agenda by RINOs crossing over in the primaries to give us a candidate that makes them happy.
Democrats For McCain2008 (established in 2006) are part of the reason he is our candidate today. And the liberals who supported him in the 2000 and 2008 primaries have fallen silent. He wasn’t selected to win, he was selected to keep out the conservatives.
The Party can’t keep a Ron Paul or David Duke OUT of the party but the GOP CAN denounce and not fund these RINOs.
And while the media was quick to point out David Duke when he became a Republican. They were silent when he was a Democrat running for office and then an Independent. He’s an Independent again.
But he helped a corrupt Democrat get elected in Louisiana. Again, he became the party’s candidate by the actions of some people voting for him. There is no history of that type of candidate in Lousiana’s GOP but he sured stained the GOP and helped them lose an election.
Yes, but it would still be a big improvement.
Just food for thought: Years ago, when Campbell was running against Feinstein for US Senator, he described himself as a “fiscal conservative and social liberal.” Although it’s difficult to imagine anything more oxymoronic than such a description, this is the reality of what you get with such an animal.
Pete McCloskey would be proud.
McCloskey finally switched to the rodent party after he helped damage Richard Pombo in ‘06.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.