Posted on 07/23/2008 1:54:04 AM PDT by goldstategop
Answers! We don't need no stink Answers!
....................../´¯/) ....................,/¯../ .................../..../ ............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸ ........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\ ........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...') .........\.................'...../ ..........''...\.......... _.·´ ............\..............( ..............\.............\...
Bingo, a voice of reason.
Then I guess you really don't mean what you advocate.
It really depends. Urinating on the street is one thing, but stopping in a park, presumably out of sight, to pee behind a tree? If that makes one a sex offender, then the large majority of men fall into that category.
being a pedophile is a crime. Consensual sex between two adults is not.
I didn’t say anything about his being a sex offender - I just said it’s gross, and I don’t care how many guys do it, it’s still gross. Might as well give up toilet-training altogether and let them crap in the streets like in India.
Yeah? Well, maybe in order to make it, you can put a cork in it, but a guy has to be humongously equiped befor he can tie a knot in it.
It's a fundamental right of every man to pee in the woods, and spell our names in the snow. And in the oceans, too. Think about that next time you're in the water and a guy is standing near you with an absent-minded look on his face :-)
Obviously this is a sensitive subject for males.
You got that right — I have a particular aversion to anything that will force me to pee in my pants if a bush is available to get behind to pee out of sight of others. I think it is downright stupid law enforcement.
It’s unfortunate that homosexual cruising in public places has become such a problem - a problem that few jurisdictions are willing to address openly. If it weren’t for that, there wouldn’t be cops behind every tree watching guys who just have to piddle.
Btw, it’s not as if women have a valve switch. Tampons are for menstruation, which if men experienced that, I assume the streets would be an abbatoir.
Men are just filthy minded, uncontrolable flashing beasts. Who like nothing better than peeing all over public places. There. Is that better?
You have posted to me several times on this thread and as yet, nothing of substance. At FR, attacking me is the same as a compliment.
And it is not just me.
You attack many on the thread.
And it is not just this thread.
Looking you up "in the forum" shows that you do the same thing on every thread.
Back when I was a cab driver I knew a few hookers - some were regular customers. I’d pick them up at home and drop them at their work sites, taking them home in the morning.
I never steered customers their way.
In one neighborhood I’d let one set in my cab while waiting for a call if the weather was cold and wet. We’d talk until I had a call or she spotted a possible John. Guess I’m jus a nice guy.
Yep, but it happens in some ones bedroom.
Are you or are you not for unlimited immigration?
Are You opposed to building a border fence?
Do you oppose sanctuary cities.
Would you vote for Joe Arpio?
These are all yes or no questions, answer any one of them.
Your question about sanctuary cities is unanswerable because the phrase sanctuary city is a feel good term that means nothing. But let me provide you some understanding.
During the Great Irish Immigration, those cities where those immigrants located developed a number of policies to deal with the problems of the immigrants. And a major component of these policies was how law enforcement would deal with those immigrants.
And those policies became successful, and solved many of the problems. And those policies became widely accepted. They are taught in City Management 101 and Law Enforcement 101.
So, if you were to rephrase you question and ask me if I support those policies, the answer would be yes.
Another of you questions about "unlimited immigration" is just plain ass dumb. Due to the demographic realities, the US will have to import significant amounts of labor. This could be new citizens, guest workers, illegals, or some combination there-of. And eventually, Congress will tip and they will reform immigration policies so that the illegal component of immigration will be minimal. If you were to try to measure this level of immigration required, you could say that the US will have to maintain a population growth rate of about 0.90%. Or, you could say that the US will have to keep the worker to retiree ratio above 3:1.
As for that fence you mentioned, the GOPers and Dems agreed in 2005 to build the fence that the BP and the BP union wanted. And I support that. But, many Texans are irritated that those landowners with stranded property probably won't receive adequate compensation.
As for Joe, I would have to know who he is running against.
Yes they are, and you managed to avoid every one of them.
Google Joe, learn something.
Your question about sanctuary cities is unanswerable because the phrase sanctuary city is a feel good term that means nothing. But let me provide you some understanding.
No would be the correct response, unless of course you favor them, then you should just pontificate on the chance that readers won't understand your true position.
Bug off I don't have time for you.
If you look at the history of you and I cross-posting, the way it always works it that you come along after the fact and try to start something. Maybe you should be the one to bug off. Or, since the thread was about your latent tendencies, maybe I should have said bugger off.
Probably more in your neighborhood than mine.
Talking with you is fruitless, you never answer a question period.
I am against open borders.
I am against unlimited Immigration.
I am disappointed in Nafta to the point of rejecting it.
I am for assimilation, not balkinization.
I do not equate Islam with Christianity.
I do not understand why white educated Europeans wait for years to immigrate.
I don't understand how Sanctuary Cities can violate law with impunity.
I don't understand why illegals are not required to speak English to gain legal status.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.