Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SumProVita

I agree they are words, but words mean things. Regardless of the results, saying third party voters “want to work for an Obama victory” is dishonest. That kind of arguing is a favorite of liberals. They are not “wanting” or “working” for an Obama victory, they are trying to tell the establishment they are fed up with the sorry choice of candidates we have this year.


95 posted on 07/24/2008 6:01:23 PM PDT by rightwinghour (http://rightwinghour.podbean.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: rightwinghour

Then allow me to change my words. Third party voters will make an Obama victory far more likely. They need to THINK about the ramifications of this, particularly with regard to national defense (which Obama wants to reduce even more than Clinton), surrendering ourselves to the decisions of the UN (including givng more of our tax $$ to the world poverty initiative), the surety of horrible appointments to the courts, nationalized (and therefore horrible) health care, tons of more taxes, and a far more acute energy crisis.....and his basic disregard to the right to life of unborn human beings.


96 posted on 07/24/2008 6:19:10 PM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson