The media's being in the tank for Obama has been a frequent topic of discussion. But to learn that the NYT reportedly rejected John McCain's editorial because they didn't think the content was suitable? The "Times" thinks it should decide what subjects a presidential candidate should and should not address, and how?
1 posted on
07/21/2008 10:32:33 AM PDT by
Will88
To: Will88
2 posted on
07/21/2008 10:33:51 AM PDT by
A. Morgan
(VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
To: Will88
This is getting ridiculous. There has to be something done, but what I don’t know.
To: Will88
As
LGF reports, they accept editorials by Yassir Arafat (well, not so much anymore) and all kinds of HAMAS people.
Apparently, they fit the style guide's rules.
4 posted on
07/21/2008 10:36:16 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Will88
the breaking news sidebar is your FRiend.
5 posted on
07/21/2008 10:36:28 AM PDT by
library user
(There's no sandwich like prawn sandwich.)
To: Will88
So, Obama releases his "plan" for Iraq before talking to our military commanders or the Iraqis themselves. His plan is simply another regurgitation of what he has always proposed...a full and headlong retreat.
All of which the NYT publishes without question, but then refuses to publish the Republican rebuttal?.
Despite the fact that Obama would take an ajbect victory, which we are in the process of obtaining, defeating enemies intent on defeating us there and brining the fight here, which is creating a much better future, much mor eliberty, and self-determination for tens of millions of people...which could create a beacon of hope and liberty in an area that has never known it, and in the process destroying tens of thousands of our abject enemies...he would take all of that and throw it to the wind in a perverse effort to get himself elected.
Obama is a self centered, marxist power monger and his true colors are showing more and more each day.
Not only would he betray the people we have liberated, not only would he betray our own long term interests and security here at home, but he would also abjectly betray the brave men and women volunteers who have sacrficed, suffered, bled, and died to make these gains possible.
The word of who Obama really is and what he represents MUST spread and it is we who must spread it because the MSM and the DNC are complicit in the lies regarding him.
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA - CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON, BUT DON'T WANT
![](http://www.jeffhead.com/obama/obama-montage1.jpg)
THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
![](http://www.jeffhead.com/obama/nobama-08.jpg)
NOBAMA '08 STICKER - SIGHTED IN IDAHO, JULY 2008
6 posted on
07/21/2008 10:37:04 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Will88
Does Warren Buffett own the Times, if so, there ya go.
7 posted on
07/21/2008 10:37:08 AM PDT by
kcm.org
(Conservatives bashing Sen. McCain has Ronald Reagan spinning in his grave!!!)
To: Will88
Hopefully McCain has finally figured out where he really stands with the media after 8 years of sucking up to them.
8 posted on
07/21/2008 10:37:20 AM PDT by
AU72
To: Will88
Here's the link with the full editorial from Drudge Report:
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashnym.htm
10 posted on
07/21/2008 10:38:01 AM PDT by
jws3sticks
(Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
To: Will88
Nothing new here . . .
Move along, move along . . .
:-)
13 posted on
07/21/2008 10:45:24 AM PDT by
seanrobins
(blog.seanrobins.com)
To: Will88
The NYT has lost all claims to credibility.
15 posted on
07/21/2008 10:46:30 AM PDT by
BooksForTheRight.com
(Fight liberal lies with knowledge. Read conservative books and articles.)
To: Will88
16 posted on
07/21/2008 10:47:08 AM PDT by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson