Why don't they just be honest and rename it the "DEMOCRATIC PARTY TIMES"???
After all, the DPT is blatantly biased on a regular basis.
That blatant bias was highlighted by the absolutely OUTRAGEOUS "HIT PIECE" on McCain with that female lobbyist a few months ago. That "hit piece" was so unconcionable and shameful that even many liberals (even Gueraldo Rivera winced for one) were embarrassed by it.
That that shameful, disguting and outrageous bias was 'child's play' compared to this blatant censorship and partisanship.
Shameful and UNCONSCIONABLE!!
Ha!
How about Communist Party Times? The DNC has been a wholly owned subsidiary of the CPUSA since 1968. The CPUSA hasn't bothered to run their own candidate for president in years - they've simply endorsed the Democratic party candidate.
That's how far they've fallen (the Dems - not the Commies!).
And should the Times’ boy win in November, you'll see this nation convulse like never before, come January ‘09....
CA....
It doesn't really pretend anymore.
Why don't they just be honest and rename it the "DEMOCRATIC PARTY TIMES"???
It is exactly that. It is the Democratic Party Times. No pretense about it. That isn't the news. The news is that people are still surprised by it and after decades of kvetching about it the GOP still hasn't developed their own press organs.
Until we solve this problem, until we get control of the information war, good luck ever electing a conservative majority, or even a GOP majority.
Weren’t they the same fools that ran with the General BETRAYus ads from the code pinko loons?
I’ve known the NYT was a rag since...
let’s see now...since I can remember ANYTHING!