Skip to comments.
NYT REJECTS MCCAIN'S EDITORIAL; SHOULD 'MIRROR' OBAMA
Drudge ^
| Mon Jul 21 2008
| Drudge
Posted on 07/21/2008 9:09:19 AM PDT by edzo4
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: Miss Didi
Rush says that the Drive-Bys are like parents escorting Little Barry on his first trip to summer camp.. That made me snort (laugh).
41
posted on
07/21/2008 9:27:24 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Either way we're screwed but I'm still voting for McCain)
To: RED SOUTH
Well, I don’t share your high opinion of the cleverness of the McCain camp. The NY Slimes has not endorsed a Republican since fricken Eisenhower and acts as an arm of the DNC.
To: edzo4
How sad is it that I'm not completely confident he would not rewrite and resubmit it?
McCain is the quintessential battered wife.
To: edzo4
Traitor NYT's Op-Ed Political Censor David Shipley ... Closer to the truth. Fair and without bias. I think not.
44
posted on
07/21/2008 9:29:27 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: edzo4
'It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama's piece As I understand this, the Times will only print an article by McCain if it agrees with Obama. It would also be nice if McCain endorsed Obama and withdrew from the race.
45
posted on
07/21/2008 9:30:05 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
(just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
To: edzo4
To: KC_Conspirator
The point wasn’t about the NYT and whothey endorse. It is that Mccain knew the story of his editorial being rejected versus Obama’s not would make a lot of news , working to get his actual editorial out , on a day that Obama is supposed to dominate
the news with his Messiac world tour this week.
To: McGruff
Rush is blasting Little Barry today. Little Barry brags about how he opposed the mission and then goes over there and makes arrogant statements completely ignoring the plans of McCain and the Commander-in-Chief.
48
posted on
07/21/2008 9:31:12 AM PDT
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: edzo4
GOD’s making the media total crooks in peoples eyes.
This isn’t McCain’s loss, its the NYT’s that has lost the last shard of credibility.
49
posted on
07/21/2008 9:31:58 AM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(Democrats still want to Impeach Pres. Bush and/or VP Cheney; keep your eye on these House hearings.)
To: edzo4
"The New York Obama"
All the Obama, All the Time
---------------------------
Who, US? In the tank for Obama?
50
posted on
07/21/2008 9:32:09 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
To: edzo4
The Obamination, like Dracula, cannot be “mirrored”!
51
posted on
07/21/2008 9:34:20 AM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: edzo4
'It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama's piece,' NYT Op-Ed editor David Shipley explained in an email late Friday to McCain's staff. 'I'm not going to be able to accept this piece as currently written.' Lockstep Communist scumbag filth.
52
posted on
07/21/2008 9:34:59 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(Ain't it grand? I'm back in the sand...)
To: edzo4
I would hope that FOX, Hannity, Rush, Laura and any other objective member of the media (I know, I know, they are few and far between),,,would PUBLISH the letter and make it their lead story!!!
The NYT has 'crossed the line' with their disgusting censorship and blatant, unconscionable bias on this one.
53
posted on
07/21/2008 9:35:55 AM PDT
by
stockstrader
(CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
To: kc8ukw
Don't worry, the more the Morons @ the NYTimes act like they are TASS or the mouthpiece for the new Fuhrer, the more likely the middle class voters will be rejecting their pure elitist/socialist crap!
54
posted on
07/21/2008 9:35:57 AM PDT
by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: edzo4
That is a good point. By refusing the editorial they have made it more interesting.
I expect bias from the NY Times, but this was unusually heavy handed. Events like this, all the network anchors going to Iraq with Obama, etc. reveal media bias more blatant than ever before. No honest person could fail to see it.
To: neutrality
Thats perfectly fine, Im just saying the way they see it editorials are supposed to be a bit more substantive. No that's not it. It's that they are in the tank for Obama.
56
posted on
07/21/2008 9:36:38 AM PDT
by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, youÂ’ve got it made." Groucho Marx)
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
They are no doubt in tank for Obama and every democrat, but that doesn’t necessarily mean this was an acceptable editorial.
To: edzo4
The NY Times practices the “Fairness Doctrine,” which means a complete media blackout of anyone to the right of Stalin.
58
posted on
07/21/2008 9:38:23 AM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: edzo4
Good for Drudge!
Now maybe some business people who are opposed to managed news and self-censorship will start pulling their ads.
59
posted on
07/21/2008 9:39:52 AM PDT
by
quintr
To: edzo4
So, McCain is not even entitled to his own opinion?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson