Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kahonek
Do you have anything other than an analogy that says they’re wrong?

Since the military defines what it means by the term, for purposes of its own rules it means what it says.

With the exception of "intends to engage in", the list all refers to overt acts. Even the "intends to engage in" term relates to a level of motivation that extends beyond mere desire, fantasy, or inclination.

29 posted on 07/21/2008 9:13:35 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

A “propensity” is not an overt act, but for the record, I was directing the question to Lucky Dog, who’s been arguing against the military’s definition of the term (via analogy) with every post.


31 posted on 07/21/2008 10:28:29 PM PDT by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson