Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Interposition

So is the ALL hoping Scalia can be replaced on the court by somebody appointed by a President Obama? What a bunch of Drivel. Talk about not knowing a good thing when you have one.


9 posted on 07/19/2008 5:22:22 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Minn
So is the ALL hoping Scalia can be replaced on the court by somebody appointed by a President Obama? What a bunch of Drivel. Talk about not knowing a good thing when you have one. 9 posted on Saturday, July 19, 2008 7:22:22 PM by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()


That’s a tricky question; because Douglas Kmiec is a pro-life conservative Catholic law professor, who stated he is voting for Obama.[1] He served in both Reagan and the first Bush administrations and has testified in Congress against Roe v Wade and for expediting confirmation of judges. It was reported that he was denied communion over that grievous announcement. McCain isn’t any better than Obama. Kmiec could have said that he was going to abstain, or vote for himself; or kept his mouth shut about his evil plan to vote for Obama.


Many years ago, I thought McCain was one of the best the GOP had in the Senate; but over the years he has proven to be one of the worst Evilcrats. I’m forced to agree with Jim Robinson: “McCain is insane and there are many good reasons not to choose him, but I'll list just five: McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman, the Keating 5, and the Gang of 14. No thanks. McCain is out!” [2]


The following quote is only a sample of Jim Robinson’s elaborations on McCain-Feingold:[3]John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts to find even one thread, one post, one paragraph, one sentence or even one lousy word posted to this web site that is not fully protected by the First Amendment! Your McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation is a treasonous act. You and your cohorts are attempting to subvert the Constitution of the United States of America, the very same constitution that you swore an oath to defend, so help you God! That makes you a domestic enemy of that great document and a traitor to your country. You miserable excuse for a two-bit political hack, you're not even qualified to shine Ronald Reagan's boots. It'll be a cold day in hell before a traitor like you ever receives my vote. You can take your fascist campaign finance laws and the jackbooted FEC anti-free-speech enforcers you are empowering and put them where the sun don't shine.” 


Clearly, McCain is not a conservative. The best that could be said of McCain is that he is a bipartisan Obamacrat: “Attn McCain Apologists: Talk all you want! But he's still a constitution trampling RINO and unless he repeals McCain-Feingold, repudiates amnesty and global warming, drops all support for embryonic stem cell research and stops talking about partnering up with the Democrats and instead swears to fight the evil bastards he won't be getting my support. You kicked the conservatives to the curb and nominated your RINO, now all you gotta do is get him elected.”[4]


That’s more than enough reason for any sane conservative to avoid McCain. Conservatives don’t have a horse in this bipartisan race on the road to perdition. There really isn’t any need to mention that McCain voted for confirmation of Ginsberg and Breyer to the U.S. Supreme Court; because pro-lifers already know that McCain is the Republicans for Murder (Choice) second choice for President.[5] Ginsberg and Breyer prove the point that McCain will do more of the same as President, when vacancies arise on the court. It’s hard to imagine McCain appointing worse than Ginsberg and Breyer; but he has a proven capacity for “treasonous” bipartisanship; ‘“But certainly in the short term, or even in the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to (undergo) illegal and dangerous operations,”’ said John McCain as reported in the San Francisco Chronicle on August 20, 1999.”[6] The Republican National Coalition for Life confirms Jim Robinson’s observations: “John McCain supports abortion for babies conceived through rape or incest and is an outspoken supporter of embryonic stem cell research, having voted to extend federal funding for such experiments.” [7] The best that could be said about McCain’s position on life is that it no different than Bill Clinton’s “safe, legal, and rare.”


On the issue of life, McCain is a Clintoncrat; and on everything else, he is an Obamacrat. I guess conservatives could sell their consciences on e-bay, vote for McCain or Obama, then buy them back; because they both reek so bad that nose holding won’t do in this race. Bob Barr admitted that abortion is murder and immediately followed that comment with one assuring the reign of death during his administration. So, as far as the Presidential race is concerned, three political parties have anti-life / anti-American candidates. The focus should be on Congressional races in conservative partisan opposition to the evil triumvirate running for President.


 [1] http://www.malibutimes.com/articles/2008/06/06/news/news5.prt The story, first circulated among the Catholic community in online blogs and posts mid-May, was taken up by Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne Jr. and National Public Radio this week

 [2] http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1962819/posts  January 31, 2008 | Jim Robinson

 [3] http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1601416/posts  March 22, 2006 11:58:42 PM by Jim Robinson

 [4] http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1994885/posts Monday, March 31, 2008 11:57:22 PM by Jim Robinson

 [5]  http://www.republicansforchoice.com/ We do support Rudy Giuliani's contention that given the folks left in the race after Rudy's withdrawal, McCain would be the best one for the Republican nomination.

 [6] http://www.rnclife.org/reports/2006/spring/ A Republican victory requires a committed, dedicated, pro-life, philosophical conservative standard-bearer, whose ideas strongly contrast with Hillary’s liberal/socialist world view. John McCain does not fit that description

 [7] http://www.rnclife.org/faxnotes/2008/jan08/08-01-16.html

 


83 posted on 07/20/2008 7:34:26 PM PDT by Interposition (McCain & Obama are two putrid political peas in the same bipartisan pod.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson