Posted on 07/18/2008 4:57:54 PM PDT by SandRat
| FORT INDIANTOWN GAP, Pa., July 18, 2008 Officials at the National Guards Eastern Aviation Training Site here yesterday unveiled the new UH-72A Lakota light utility helicopter, for which they will become the militarys sole trainers.
Ultimately, the Lakota will replace UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters to be transferred for operational missions, as well as the last of the Vietnam-vintage UH-1 Huey helicopters that remain in the military arsenal, Jones said. The Lakota is the military version of the Eurocopter EC-145 commercial aircraft, designed to fly light general support operations such as civil search and rescue, personnel recovery, evacuation, counter-drug and limited civil command and control operations for the Department of Homeland Security. It carries up to 11 people. Pilots who fly the twin-turbine aircraft reported its a powerful aircraft that handles well in all weather conditions, including storms that most aviators avoid. The Lakota also burns significantly less fuel than the Black Hawk or other similar aircraft, Jones said. But unlike the Black Hawk, the Lakota is not designed to operate in combat environments and is considered non-deployable, Jones said. Army Gen. Richard A. Cody, Army vice chief of staff, accepted the Army's first Lakota helicopter during a December 2006 ceremony in Columbus, Miss. Cody said the Lakota is not only serving as a catalyst for change across the Army, it is also accelerating the speed of Army aviation modernization and integration with other services and government agencies. The Army National Guard is slated to receive most of the 322 Lakota aircraft to enter the inventory. The Fort Indiantown Gap training site received its first Lakota aircraft last month and its second about two weeks ago. Army Col. Timothy Hilty, who commands the site, said two more Lakotas are due by the years end, with another four arriving by 2012. Instructors from the Army Aviation Center at Fort Rucker, Ala., and Fort Indiantown Gap are already leading the first training course. A high-tech simulator at the training site and a cockpit trainer with a wrap-around screen provide realistic training conditions, Jones said. Pennsylvanias Adjutant General, Army Maj. Gen. Jessica L. Wright, said the Eastern Army National Guard Aviation Training Site has a history of providing excellent training and promised those trained here will receive the best training possible. The aircraft will also be available to respond to emergencies, as needed, she said. |
Brother copter to Hartford Hospital’s “LifeStar” — of which we have two. Hard-working bird.
Couldn't the US buy an AMERICAN helicopter?
“Couldn’t the US buy an AMERICAN helicopter?”
Yeah, if they wanted to waste ten years and a hundred million dollars developing it.
Seems sensible enough. Need a good light helo for utility work and the blackhawk is a bit much for that sort of thing.
They should buy the best helicopter for the money. If that’s this one, then so be it.
Anything else is irresponsible.
Put a gatling gun on it and katie clear the barn..
Made in Mississippi, ya’ll!
I appreciate the fact that many of us still think of us as Confederates down here, but Lincoln settled the issue over a hundred years ago.
It’s obviously a modified COTS/NDI acquisition. Made by EAD North America in Columbus, Mississippi. (http://www.uh-72a.com/about/overview.asp)
(COTS/NDI = Commercial-Off-The-Shelf/Non-Developmental Item).
Don’t know any of the details about the competition to fill the requirement. The EADS win might have been part of a reciprical purchase agreement to payback our European allies for all the U.S. equipment they’ve purchased. U.S. competing entries might have been too expensive, noncompetitive on performance, or required more development than DoD wanted to pay for. The fact that it shares commonality with DHS aircraft may have been a factor.
Getting excited about this is like getting excited about all those low and mid-price US-made Japanese cars and trucks Americans buy.
Be more concerned about the development of the replacements for the AH-64 Apache, the AH-1 Cobra, and whatever is going to fill the mission requirement of the canceled RAH-66 Comanche. We are going to spend billions developing these combat helicopters and we will buy multiple thousands of them.
Think Bell or Hughes would have been a better bet than buying and sending money to EADS for there corruption and bribe money slush funds that undermine American industry and jobs.
My guess is athat as Boeing didn't have a hog in the fight, this comepetition was deciced on the merits
What I said a year sgo http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1881203/posts?page=50#50
At rough guess Bell 412 too old (there's a limit to how much you can upgrade a 50s design): [Augusta-Westland]139 too big: Hughes 900 too small: EC-145 just right.
"right-sized" : I seem to have heard that a lot lately
At rough guess Bell 412 too old (there’s a limit to how much you can upgrade a 50s design): [Augusta-Westland]139 too big: Hughes 900 too small: EC-145 just right.
“right-sized” : I seem to have heard that a lot lately
Size don’t matter if it cannot do the job. And fails to meet basic RFP requirements
should have gone with the MD902
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD_900
hate seeing all that money going to EADS..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.