[green iguana]

You’re a bit disingenuous Mr. Gay. Somehow you left off the bright red disclaimer at the beginning of the article:

This article has not undergone any scientific peer review. Its conclusions are in disagreement with the overwhelming opinion of the world scientific community. The Council of the American Physical Society disagrees with this article’s conclusions.

Also interesting that the brief article immediately preceding this one is a peer reviewed bit of typical global-warming, hand-wringing clap trap.

[Matchett-PI]

"..Its conclusions are in disagreement with the overwhelming opinion of the world scientific community. The Council of the American Physical Society disagrees with this article’s conclusions. .."

IMMATERIAL. See my post #14.

[RogerFGay]

Well, we can now spot a real "denier" a mile away. The posted article summarizes information from a peer-reviewed article. There's even a link in it to the peer-reviewed scientific article. The article states the name of the peer-reviewed journal that the article appears in. The same information has also been presented at a conference, and received a standing ovation from attending scientists.

Al Gore's claim that his version of climate "science" was favored by scientific consensus has always - always been a bogus claim. The only consensus was that it had gotten warmer during the 20th century. There never was much support in the scientific community for the IPCC's stuff either; which btw, does not represent scientific consensus. The IPCC has and always has been a political committee.