[djsherin]

“The United States is the only country to take the position that some police misconduct must automatically result in the suppression of physical evidence.”

That’s because America tends to believe in these things called “rights” for all citizens regardless of what they may have done.

[eastforker]

If there is no writ you must aquit.

[Shermy]

Is Scalia going to recite “foreign law?”

[monocle]

That’s because America tends to believe in these things called “rights” for all citizens regardless of what they may have done.

There are alternatives to the exclusion rule. For example, evidence obtained without a warrant could be admitted and the officer guilty of such misconduct could be prosecuted.

[Hacksaw]

That’s because America tends to believe in these things called “rights” for all citizens regardless of what they may have done.

Unfortunately, this "right" was invented by the courts in the first place.