Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Um..We are not adding carbon either. We may be taking carbon that is already in the environment and putting it into another form when we burn carbon containing fuels, but then all those hydrocarbons were once living and therefore once came from carbon dioxide aspirated by a plant. Unless we find a way to mine the moon or Mars, we can’t add anything to the environment here on earth. We got a well stocked planet.


93 posted on 07/17/2008 6:41:09 PM PDT by JeanLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: JeanLM

I disagree. We are taking carbon that was sequestered from the atmosphere and the biosphere for millions of years and we are putting it back into the atmosphere.

Since 1750, this input from man, along with possibly other unknown factors, has resulted in atmospheric carbon dioxide going from 280 ppm to 380 ppm.

Is this a problem? Scientifically speaking, we don’t know yet.

Is there some level at which the greenhouse effect associated with human-introduced carbon would become a huge problem? Absolutely. 1000 or 2000 ppm might be such a level, and besides would begin to have direct human health effects. Below those levels we just don’t know at present how the roughly 25% increase since 1750 will affect the weather.

That such an increase has occurred is not really open to debate. What the increase means for today and tomorrow is not known at present, despite what the warmists claim.


139 posted on 07/18/2008 5:52:34 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson