HA HA! Somebody call a WAAAAAAAAAAmbulance for poor Connie. A pretend New Yorker stuck in flyover country.
I find her baby shower conversation likely exaggerated or Connie simply doesn't understand someone speaking in jest.
Liberals causing headaches for other Libs!
Here's a real ironic cartoon for the New Yorker readers:
Connie Schultz: get over yourself, lady.
The problem with that cartoon is that is how the MSM see all right leaning folks. that cartoon is not meant to be funny it is meant to depict...
His willful, long term associations who are domestic terrorists, American haters, corrupt financeres, etc., his stances on the issues, his own words have established the frame work and nuance by which he will be judged.
...and his running away from his own past does not help him in the least:
I live somewhere else, and I thought it was hilarious.
Offended? And here all along I thought the outrage was over lampooning conservatives. Regardless, thank you “The New Yorker” (VRWC charter member since 7/2008)
If Obamalama loses, I might just get it framed.
This must be one of those "bitter" people who insists upon "clinging" to religion, according to BHO.
How predictable; that an Obamanist would go out of her way to characterize any opposition to her Savior in the most extreme manner that she can possibly dream up.
The Left has to distort reality in order to make their points whereas normal people only have to state the clear, obvious and entirely verifiable facts in order to mount a devastating argument.
Smugly she is.
"You don't really think that," the woman said.
Oh, yes, she did. Nodding her head, she added, "You can read all about it in the Bible. In Revelation."
Keep in mind, this is one-half of a prominent political couple in a county where they know virtually everybody. Imagine how many people she might run into on any given day.
The woman who wrote this is nothing but a damn hypocrite.
cschultz@plaind.com
But Connie dear....
The New Yorker has been deluged by readers’ complaints about the cartoon.
I guess the supposed “Sophisticatd Readers” of the New Yorker don’t get the joke either!
Ohio Democratic Senator-elect Sherrod Brown and his wife Connie Schultz
No such thing. Leftist, elitist moonbats and leftist, elitist, moonbat wannabes are the regular readers.
LOL! As a native New Yorker I can say that the other "America" this rube is talking about is about four neighborhoods.
Neighborhoods that are inhabited almost exclusively by rubes like herself, not native New Yorkers.
The kind of people who "can't take it anymore" living in perfectly serviceable communities in the South and Midwest because of "all the narrow-minded" people (like their parents, teachers, pastors, etc.) there who refuse to acknowledge "my special gifts and talents."
“Barack Obama is the anti-Christ.”
This woman is entitled to vote however she wants to. She doesn’t have to ask Connie Schultz if Schultz agrees with her.
It makes as much sense as believing that Obama is some startingly new Messiah, who will solve all our problems by using methods that have failed here and all over the World. And it makes as much sense as voting for Obama because he’s black.
The funny part is that your cartoon is what the New Yorker was trying to communicate, but failed miserably.
The problem with the New Yorker cartoon is that they used a barely visible title on the cartoon to clearly convey the message. Good cartoons don’t require captions or titles. Palestinian newspapers run ridiculously anti-Semitic depictions of Jews in Israel in cartoons that are to be taken at face value. White supremacist magazines do the same with black people portrayed as monkeys with big lips, with the images accurately reflecting the viewpoint of the publisher.
If they meant to poke fun at the media or rednecks, then where the hell are the media or the rednecks in the image? You could have done it exactly the way your cartoon did it, or have Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh painting a picture and the cartoon of Obama was the resulting art, or the image could have been a part of a news broadcast with art of the news anchor included in the finished product of the comic.
It’s lazy and/or incompetent artistry. That’s the “crime” here. No business would be satisfied with this level of effort if they had hired this artist to create an image for some marketing or promotional campaign or an announcement.
If the Obama supporters had not made such a big deal about this cartoon, it would have been seen by the about ten people who subscribe to the New Yorker. Now it’s national news.