What seems to be part of a red cross is seen on a bib worn by a man involved in the rescue in this official image.
1 posted on
07/16/2008 11:42:05 AM PDT by
Abathar
To: Abathar
A more important question: why did Colombia allow images of the rescuers to be released at all? (at least their faces should have been obscured)
Now the Military Intel and rescue dudes are all on FARC death lists (assuming that FARC has not yet collapsed - it’s in decline but I don’t think they are without capabilities)!!!!!!!
2 posted on
07/16/2008 11:47:04 AM PDT by
Enchante
(BILL AYERS: "Now THESE are the Obamas I knew! Thank you, New Yorker, for showing my real friends!")
To: Abathar
Looks more like a Bigfoot photo to me.
3 posted on
07/16/2008 11:48:28 AM PDT by
OSHA
(framing it as though you've magically neutralized any potential negative eventuality)
To: Abathar
The question that no one is asking is:
Why would the FARC trust the Red Cross to ferry their hostages from one camp to another and why would the Red Cross agree to do so in the first place?
The inescapable answer is that they have done it before and are actively helping the FARC.
4 posted on
07/16/2008 11:49:15 AM PDT by
usurper
(Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
To: Abathar
"The Red Cross emblem has to be respected in all circumstances and cannot be used in an abusive manner. "The ICRC as neutral and impartial must have the confidence of all the sides in the conflict in order to carry out its humanitarian work."
I understand the confidence part of this. But how this could be construed as an "abusive manner" escapes me. A Columbian acknowledgment that this was done without IRC approval should be the end of the matter. With my understanding of the IRC, however, I have my doubts.
5 posted on
07/16/2008 11:49:31 AM PDT by
bcsco
(To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
To: Abathar
Sorry FARC...we had to use the Red Cross! It was an emergency you see!
6 posted on
07/16/2008 11:49:44 AM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny)
To: Abathar
Gee what a surprise as the MSM describes an operation AGAINST the terrorists as a “war crime’. While Hezbollah uses Red Cross vehicles in suicide missions and they are ignored ( considered by the press as innovative i guess)
7 posted on
07/16/2008 11:50:43 AM PDT by
sportscaster
('LET'S ROLL")
To: Abathar
To: Abathar
The silliness and stupidity of the MSM knows no bounds. The other side uses Red Cross emblems not to rescue illegally held hostages but rather to ferry suicide bombs and bombers close to unsuspecting civilians.
I'm afraid I will not live long enough to see the end of the MSM.
9 posted on
07/16/2008 11:57:16 AM PDT by
jwparkerjr
(Sigh . . .)
To: Abathar
Such a use of the Red Cross emblem could constitute a "war crime" under the Geneva Conventions... That's not fair!!! Only Hamas and Hesbollah are allowed to use Red Cross symbols on their vehicles to transport weapons and bombs!
-PJ
11 posted on
07/16/2008 11:58:27 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
To: Abathar
Such a use of the Red Cross emblem could constitute a "war crime" under the Geneva Conventions and international humanitarian law and could endanger humanitarian workers in the future, according to international legal expert Mark Ellis, executive director of the International Bar Association.Oh, bite me!
I hereby offer "legal expert" Mark Ellis to FARC as a hostage to atone for this grave error. And I further propose a special policy for his case; No negotiation, no rescue.
Let the International Bar Association litigate that!
To: Abathar
Does this mean the hostages have to go back ?
13 posted on
07/16/2008 12:04:24 PM PDT by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: Abathar
I am not going to lose too much sleep over this one.
14 posted on
07/16/2008 12:14:25 PM PDT by
gridlock
(Al Gore wants YOU to live like the Flintstones while HE lives like the Jetsons.)
To: Abathar
Yuniesky Betancourt a hostage in Columbia? That explains his complete disappearance from the Mariner's offense... Batting 216 over the last 10 games.
Oh, not THAT Betancourt? Carry on, then...
16 posted on
07/16/2008 12:20:34 PM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
To: Abathar
aaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
17 posted on
07/16/2008 12:23:11 PM PDT by
Carley
To: Abathar
Let’s see, Bush announces lifting of ban on offshore drilling, oli price drops, other news needed. This is just an attempt to give the talking heads on CNN and MSNBC something to scream at each other about, so they do not have to talk about energy policy.
19 posted on
07/16/2008 12:46:03 PM PDT by
webheart
(I am Webheart, and I approved this post.)
To: Abathar
What, the Red Cro$$ is mad because the rescuers used their symbol and didn’t pay for the use???!
20 posted on
07/16/2008 1:10:43 PM PDT by
blu
(Last one out of Michigan, please turn off the lights.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson