Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberSpartacus
"Everybody has hydrogen production capability. It’s called a battery, two electordes, and water."

Except it isn't cost effective. It takes more energy to make hydrogen than the energy produced by using that hydrogen in a fuel cell.

Methanol fuel cells are more cost effective because methanol is cheaper to produce.

using regular gasoline in a fuel cell would be even cheaper, but because "fossil" fuels has sulpher in it it poisons the cell eventually.

Why use gas in a fuel cell you say? because the fuel cell converts it into energy many times more efficiently than burning it does, and it does it much cleaner.

Methanol is a better fuel for a fuel cell because it has no sulfur in it.

18 posted on 07/16/2008 11:01:41 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Nathan Zachary
using regular gasoline in a fuel cell would be even cheaper, but because "fossil" fuels has sulpher in it it poisons the cell eventually.

Sulfur and lead poison Pt catalysts. Do they poison nanosphere carbon catalysts?

22 posted on 07/16/2008 11:07:54 AM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson