To: DGHoodini
But yoy still have to split the H from the O2 and that takes energy.
12 posted on
07/16/2008 10:42:23 AM PDT by
fella
("...He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
To: fella
That’s what nuclear reactors are for. The new “pebble” reactors, are smaller, cheaper and faster to build, will use standard parts and a boilerplate design, so that any employee can go from one site to the next, and not have to re-learn everything,about the new plant, the way the ones we have now are, as they were all “custom built” and have many more faiilure points than the newer safer “pebble” reactors.
14 posted on
07/16/2008 10:48:47 AM PDT by
DGHoodini
(Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand)
To: fella
But yoy still have to split the H from the O2 and that takes energy. Yes, but there is value in converting from a wire tied to a fixed source to portable.
20 posted on
07/16/2008 11:04:54 AM PDT by
null and void
(Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
To: fella
It is possible to do that with solar panels....
To bad the market can't build mini nuclear plants ( kind of like on a nuke aircraft carrier ) for small towns to make electricity and for hydrogen production.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson