Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Christopher Lincoln

The lawsuits are not over. If a firearm is not in a state to be readily used, the owner really doesn’t have a meaningful “right to keep and bear.”


4 posted on 07/15/2008 10:46:09 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Man, that's stupid ... even by congressional standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RobinOfKingston

Unfortunately it will turn on the words “keep and bear” which obviously do not contemplate “use.”


7 posted on 07/15/2008 11:11:16 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson