Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster
Tsar Nicholas wasn't much of a ruler. He pretty much squandered the throne left him by his father, Alexander, and managed to alienate just about everybody when he married a German duchess. His hemophiliac son was seen as a righteous curse for bringing in an "outsider."

Josef Stalin, on the other hand, served as the avuncular figurehead to a nation staggered by war, and kept the torch burning in the Kremlin even during the darkest days.

He also murdered somewhere around 10 million of his subjects.

It is only because Kruschev "de-Stalinized" Russia in the 50s that Uncle Joe isn't more of an icon than Vladimir Ilyich.

18 posted on 07/15/2008 6:49:17 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
Tsar Nicholas wasn't much of a ruler. He pretty much squandered the throne left him by his father, Alexander, and managed to alienate just about everybody when he married a German duchess. His hemophiliac son was seen as a righteous curse for bringing in an "outsider."

Didn't most of the Tsars going back to the 18th century marry German princesses. I read about the Tsars family would travel around Germany looking for wives for the sons in the family.

33 posted on 07/15/2008 7:43:47 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson