Let us examine just who is to be offended.
'F***in"-well, that speaks for itself. An adjective modifying the word "Ni***er". Why does Mr.Jackson get a pass when he uses it derisively and Mr.Imus gets his name destroyed when he used it comedically? O'Reilly screwed he pooch here.
But the word "Half-Breed" is meant to disclose a gilded and prejudiced opinion of Mr.Obama - but which half should we presume he was demonstrating such disgust and disdain? I thought blacks were not prejudiced and racist. Surely Mr.Jackson was not using the term as one of endearment.
O'Reilly made a conscious effort to change the subject regarding the comments of Jackson. The comment 'cutting of his nuts' was a street term, a 'hood' term to disclose his displeasure with Mr.Obamas' position. Mr.Jackson went 'way-further' than a comment regarding the Obama jewels and the dispatching of them. This was not a comment which even needed to be reported upon. But the "F***in Half-Breed N***ger" was the story. Not the "Nut" silliness. Then O'Reilly reported upon the lame excuse that Jackson came up with to deflect the nut story, that being Obama needed to get in with Hillary's group by showing his feminine side. That was a lie and O'Reilly was an enabler of that lie. O'Reilly should be diciplined. Jackson should never be heard from again..