Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

Actually, the Supreme Court simply affirmed the lower court’s ruling (gave lots of reasoning behind the affirmation, but the upshot is that the lower verdict rules). DC will have to deal with Judge Silverman, who months ago made it clear he’s tired with DC’s shenanigans. DC got their stay of Silverman’s ruling, SCOTUS affirmed the ruling, and now in defiance of Silverman’s crystal-clear verdict DC is re-enacting 85% of what they were doing in the first place.

Upshot: it doesn’t have to reach SCOTUS again. The circuit judges will take care of this.


51 posted on 07/16/2008 1:55:11 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
ctdonath2 said: "Actually, the Supreme Court simply affirmed the lower court’s ruling ..."

It would be a wholesome thing for the DC Circuit to hold DC to "strict scrutiny", but I'm not sure that you are correct regarding the Circuit Court decision. I think the Supreme Court decision was narrower and avoided applying any particular level of scrutiny. I will re-read Heller to see if this is made clear or not.

56 posted on 07/16/2008 5:56:13 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson