[AngelesCrestHighway]

It appears the New Yorker Magazine backed Hillary in the primary....

[gov_bean_ counter]

If you do not drop out I shall taunt you a second time...

[Carley]

Reminds me of another group who reacted to a cartoon.

Just can’t seem to remember which group that was rioting all across europe.

[FatherofFive]

Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me!

We know W is not a homosexual cowboy. Not even funny. No response or publicity.

The words and pictures hurt B. Hussein Obama for two reasons:
1. They are true
2. They expose his lies

[Jeff Head]

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA - CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON, BUT DON'T WANT

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

[alloysteel]

What was it that Phil Gramm said about whiners?

Everything goes double for the Obamas, the Marxist and the docile Muslim suicide bomber being sent out into the marketplace.

Herself, still the Cold and Joyless, stands a chance of overturning this nomination process even yet.

George Soros is just hedging his bets.

O’Bambi is standing in the headlights, while the driver of the vehicle stands behind the opened door, and sights in with the deer rifle.

What an excellent trophy to hang on the wall of that secret club in Manhattan.

[pnh102]

The irrepressible Doug Ross dug up a New Yorker cover mocking Bush and Cheney as the gay cowboys from Brokeback Mountain, sarcastically noting the missing firestorm of protest.

That is because the Bush administration respects the God-given right of free speech, even if it speech that is offensive or critical to the administration. Obama, on the other hand, does not respect free speech. His campaign's criticism of the cover of the New Yorker, as well as his followers' attacking other media outlets who criticize the Messiah himself, is proof positive that as President, Obama will actively prohibit any speech that he finds objectionable.

FR better get a hosting provider in another country!

[libstripper]

Republicans didn’t get particularly upset over things like the Cheny/Bush cover because they were so obviosly false. The Obama cover, however, is unintentionaly true; thus the Obama people have to do everything they can to attack it.

[montag813]

An Idea: Let’s make this thread a bulletin board for the most offensive cartoons and covers against Republicans we have ever seen. Certainly the repulsive ones targeting Condi Rice hld special significance.

[Montaignes Cat]

The December 5, 2005 New Yorker cover depicted Bush as a housemaid in an apron with a feather duster while Cheney in an easy chair smokes a cigar, with beer cans and crooked paintings in the Oval Office.

The recent Gay Pride / Queer Issue of the Village Voice shows Bush and Cheney passionately kissing, with the caption Make Love Not War

Another Village Voice cover showed Bush as a vampire sucking blood from a cadaverous Statue of Liberty.

[Beckwith]

Obama believes he is above criticism and will act aggressively to prevent stories and images, he and his supporters believe are unflattering from being published.  Obama has become a one-man national censor.

A while back, Obama was all upset that his wife, Michelle, received fire for her anti-American views, and ordered the media and Republicans to "leave my wife alone" -- even as the bride was out dissing the United States.

Two weeks ago, Dr. Danielle Allen, who failed to identify herself as an Obama campaign worker and maximum contributor, attacked me and a couple of others in the Washington Post for daring to publish, on the Internet, opinion that she believes is unflattering to Obama.  She calls it calumny, the intentional and generally vicious false accusation of a crime or other offense designed to damage one's reputation.  She wants those she finds guilty of calumny to be shunned and punished under the law.

Two days ago, Obama and his sycophants got their panties in a bunch over the New Yorker cover page showing Obama dressed as a Somali elder (quite true) and Michelle dressed as Angela Davis in the Oval Office, where an American flag burns in the fireplace (image below).

Now, Obama's people are crying "racism" that John McLaughlin used the term "oreo" in a discussion of Jesse Jackson's threat to cut Obama's nuts off.  Mind you, McLaughlin never called or inferred Obama was an "oreo," or Jackson either, but that didn't matter to the Obamalytes, because what Obama is attempting to do is to silence any criticism or perceived criticism of him, and by extension, his wife.  CNN even reported that McLaughlin's innocent comments caused an uproar -- what?

We all have watched as the left has portrayed the President of the United States, George W. Bush with the most unbelievable, doctored images.  Search Google, using the word "Bush" and "Hitler," "chimp," "evil," or "murderer" to see what the Left has been up to for the last 7 years.

George Bush, ever a man, simply ignored these vicious attacks.  Obama, on the other hand,  whines like a child.

But it's worse.  Obama has an agenda here.  He and his minions want to silence any criticism of Obama -- anything that they see as unflattering.  They even stoop to identifying their critics as racists -- which is really strange, since Obama, himself has displayed his personal racism in his writings and spoken words for years.

Beware this guy.  He truly has the instincts of a fascist.

The Obama File -- Latest News

[Biggirl]

The Obamas work themselves up over the smallest of things. This shows how thin-skin they are. Just a thought.