To: Texas Eagle; goldstategop; Wil H; FlyVet
"I'm not familiar with The New Yorker. Is it typically a Conservative mag or is it apolitical?"For New York City it's about middle -- which means liberal for most normal folk. But it's got class. It is very literary, often tongue-in-cheek -- and I'd say famous for its cartoons (which is why this cover art of BO and MO is the center of such attention).
Decades ago, James Thurber used to write and cartoon there [On the other hand the noxious "drive-by" Seymour Hersh is one of the contributors there today.]
Real leftists have no sense of humor, so I think calling The New Yorker a "leftist rag" is a bit harsh. If I see it in a waiting room, I pick it up for its hallmark cartoons, if nothing else.
29 posted on
07/15/2008 12:41:16 AM PDT by
Uncle Ralph
(Avuncular in the jugular vein.)
To: Uncle Ralph; Texas Eagle
I was going to say......but Uncle Ralph beat me to it.
The New Yorker is avant garde, makes fun of everything in an intellectual way, has great cartoons throughout the spread. It also has devastatingly serious essays on current issues going from left to right. You can pick and choose. It ain't Time or News Weak, its editors actually have three digit IQs.
30 posted on
07/15/2008 1:21:32 AM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson