1 posted on
07/14/2008 11:03:59 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
2 posted on
07/14/2008 11:04:24 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
3 posted on
07/14/2008 11:06:03 AM PDT by
rawhide
To: ShadowAce
Man, think about how many folding@home units a day that monster could crunch. :)
5 posted on
07/14/2008 11:08:42 AM PDT by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: ShadowAce
Sun Microsystems is already shipping (slower clocked) 64-thread, 8-core processors, that run relatively mainstream OSes like Solaris and Linux and OpenBSD.
What does IBM have? A promise to ship something (quantity and pricing unknown) two years from now...
6 posted on
07/14/2008 11:09:21 AM PDT by
ikka
To: ShadowAce
The scary thing is that in about 10 years your home PC will blow the doors off this machine.
7 posted on
07/14/2008 11:10:29 AM PDT by
2001convSVT
("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
To: ShadowAce
So, how fast is the disk I/O on the machine? I’ll be impressed when the disk I/O is as fast as the processors.
8 posted on
07/14/2008 11:11:47 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(OBAMA IS AN ARAB! _NEENER_NEENER!)
To: ShadowAce
Microsoft just found its miniumum requirements for the next version of Windows.
9 posted on
07/14/2008 11:14:26 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Whale oil: the renewable biofuel for the 21st century.)
To: ShadowAce
I was forced to buy a new desktop for the home, and although there is nothing wrong with a dual core machine with an out of the box 2 ghz, whose mother board can accept a quad core processor,
if you can, wait until the new motherboard architecture is out, because these "old" 775 socket type boards are going to be obsolete. That way you should get a good 8 years (or more with upgrades)of use out of it before the next generation of computer comes along rather than buying one that is already obsolete.
To: ShadowAce
for sheer gigaflops, I’d say Obama’s running a close second.
To: ShadowAce
Cool! I'll take two of 'em.
16 posted on
07/14/2008 11:29:22 AM PDT by
rdb3
(Upward, onward, beyond...)
To: ShadowAce
100 racks isn’t actually all that much, just 10x10 racks. If you wanted to, you could squeeze them into an area the size of a small house (about 70x24 feet) and still have room to walk around. I’ve seen bigger datacenters, but of course nothing with even close to this much power.
To: ShadowAce
Pong...like it never was before!
23 posted on
07/14/2008 6:35:18 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson