Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar

No...it’s about 1.3x. But I agree that diesel engines are superior. They are also inherently fuel-flexible.


11 posted on 07/14/2008 6:24:40 AM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
But I agree that diesel engines are superior.

The efficiencies of a Diesel engine over a gasoline engine are inherent. It is in the design of the cycle itself. The Diesel cycle is more efficient than the Otto (Gasoline engine) cycle.

You can futz around all you want with Gasoline engines to remove some of those inefficiencies, and in fact a well designed turbo can do nice things for it, but there are "pumping losses" associated with the Otto cycle (basically, the engine has to use energy to "suck" air into the combustion chamber), that the Diesel cycle does not have. Thats one reason that Diesel engines get such good gas mileage on the highways, they only use as much fuel as they need to keep the engine turning over. In a gasoline engine, there is a significant amount of energy used in pumping/sucking the air through the intake manifold restrictions(the throttle basically). Diesels have no throttle, they are controlled by the amount of fuel that is injected into them.

That, plus the fact that they run at much higher compression ratios, which means that they can extract more energy from the fuel they burn.

33 posted on 07/14/2008 7:05:35 AM PDT by Paradox (Politics: The art of convincing the populace that your delusions are superior to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson