To: mkjessup
And Kennedy, Roosevelt and Clinton should have produced their medical records.
Kennedy should have produced the papers from his first marriage.
Eisenhower should have told us about Kay and Mamie's drinking.
W should have told us about the DWI
Clinton should have told us about his long trips behind the Iron Curtain...
The list is endless.
62 posted on
07/13/2008 1:18:52 PM PDT by
MindBender26
(Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
To: MindBender26
And Kennedy, Roosevelt and Clinton should have produced their medical records.
Kennedy should have produced the papers from his first marriage.
Irrelevant.
Eisenhower should have told us about Kay and Mamie's drinking.
Irrelevant.
W should have told us about the DWI
Irrelevant.
Clinton should have told us about his long trips behind the Iron Curtain...
Irrelevant.
The list is endless.
Yes, the list of irrelevancies IS endless. And the reason each and every one of those items you've listed is irrelevant is because there is NO Constitutional issue involved in producing medical records, marriage records, drinking, trips anywhere in the world, etc.
In not ONE of the instances you have cited was there a question of the candidate's Constitutional eligibility to serve as President.
In the case of Barack Hussein Obama, there is. And it should be answered not with doctored-up, photo shopped, altered facsimiles of an alleged original document, but with the original, unaltered, birth certificate.
68 posted on
07/13/2008 2:03:59 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson