One thing that's been bugging me is who made the decision to hace the CIA ask veterans of Iraq whether they'd witnessed an illegal killing. I figure they'd have to be pretty far up the food chain to influence the CIA.
I was doing a search for 'mark fox ncis' and stumbled across this;
After that fateful October meeting at Gitmo, Special Agent Mark Fallon of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service e-mailed a colleague, saying that what he'd heard there "could shock the conscience of any legal body" that might someday look into the Bush regime's interrogation methods. Added Fallon: "This looks like the kind of stuff Congressional hearings are made of."
At long last, the previously secret memos and e-mails detailing that October meeting and its consequences were disclosed, for the first time, at a June 17 hearing by the Senate Armed Services Committee. The hearing was chaired by Democratic Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, who asked, with some alarm, during the testimony by former Pentagon officials: "How on earth did we get to the point where a senior United States government lawyer would say that . . . torture is 'subject to perception'?"
At a liberal rag;
Seems like a pretty direct link between NCIS and Carl Levin/ The Senate Armed Services Committee. I wonder who SA Mark Fallon's "collegue" was?
Also, my link doesn't appear to be working. Try again;
1. Kill the prisoners that were trying to kill him just seconds prior.
2. Let them go free so they could try to kill him and his marines at a later date.
War is an ugly son of a bit-h. I can not fault Sergent Nazario and his men.