Why stop at girls.
Now we have Babyz.
Posted on 07/12/2008 10:03:32 AM PDT by AJKauf
The media's relentless pimping of young girls is profitable — and destructive.
(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...
What’s being done to the image of young girls in our society is nothing less than a crime.
...and so much of it starts on the Disney Channel.
Why stop at girls.
Now we have Babyz.
I am sure there have always been slutty women to parade in front of men away from families and decent society....I don't care about that...
but to normalize the sexualization of young women from "Hooters" to thongs for babies to Jon Benet Ramsey and that crowd.....
the culture is in the trash and its not because of the big things...but the little things that have accumulated...the little actions that have been accepted and defended...
we Americans need to look in the mirror..even we "moral" ones or ones that consider themselves Christian or patriotic or conervative....if you are indulged in activity that crosses the line, there is no reason to not include yourself in the culture destruction.
Disney encourages kids to be pedophile bait and that is the truth. As for values and beliefs they encourage LEFTIST godless values and beliefs. If you want you kids to be Christian, don’t let Disney be part of their viewing.
yes young people have sex desires and all that.
but they have taken it to an extreme with all these sexy fashions for such young girls.
Bring back simple dresses and skirts, or simple pants and tops, without being revealing. That would help reverse this. And somebody said in the article, bring back schoool uniforms. School uniform type clothing is very plain and not provocative. That is better clothing for teenage girls to wear. And go easy on all the make up and cosmetics too.
Back in the day, didn’t mothers warn their daughters about dressing more modestly so as not to attract bad attention from men? Didn’t they warn them that they are putting out an invitation for things they aren’t ready for by dressing and acting in these provocative ways?
Maybe mothers still warn their daughters about things, but the message may be lost in the desire to be fashionable and trendy per the media messages.
> And somebody said in the article, bring back schoool uniforms. School uniform type clothing is very plain and not provocative. That is better clothing for teenage girls to wear. And go easy on all the make up and cosmetics too.
Here in New Zealand this is the norm: public schools, private schools, integrated schools — all have school uniforms.
Believe it or not, there are twisted perverts who actually get off on the thought of little girls in school uniforms.
Crikey!
The real answer is perhaps a complete rejection of Pop Culture from, say, 1945 onward. It has been a long slippery slope that started out slowly and innocently but has been moving at a fair ol’ rate of knots lately, with no apparent end in sight to the ever-increasing nosedive in public mores.
This slide in public mores probably coincides with the advent of television, rock-n-roll and women’s rights. I don’t see any of these things going away anytime soon, so if there is anything stronger than mere correlation with these things, Civilization is fair poked. Rooted beyond all recovery. Knackered beyond redemption. Buggered for all eternity. Broken.
Did you notice how horrified the media was with the modest dress of the women, men, girls, and boys from the YFZ ranch?
It is an upside down world.
I remember the Christmas that my father bought my mother her **first** pair of slacks. They were a beautiful brown wool and lined with silk. Prior to that my mother always wore skirts and dresses.
Back in the day, didn’t mothers warn their daughters about dressing more modestly so as not to attract bad attention from men? Didn’t they warn them that they are putting out an invitation for things they aren’t ready for by dressing and acting in these provocative ways?
Maybe mothers still warn their daughters about things, but the message may be lost in the desire to be fashionable and trendy per the media messages.
That was in the old days.
Today, many of these mothers are COMPETING with their daughters seeking attention for all the wrong reasons. Many are not the ideal “example”.
I think we are about 50 years too late!
And this week you have leftists wanting to label toddlers as “racist” for not liking certain foods. They’re wanting to make newborns into adults, thus coddling of baby rapers will be their next “logical” step.
Dude...TMI.......lol
Just another way a cult separates their members from the outside world and reinforces that they are a people apart. The FLDS cult also liked to break apart families, because like the Communists before them, they know that familial bonds are the only thing stronger than the ties to the State or cult.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.