Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RushingWater; RedRover
And even in the chaos of the first day of house-to-house fighting, Marines were told they could not fire freely at anyone, the attorney said.

But if it were a few days later, ROE's were loosened to get the job done.

In many of the cases where Marines have faced charges of "war crimes", they are simply a difference in interpreting the Rules of Engagement. Herschel Smith has written various articles concerning ROE. Here is but one example, More Evidence Against the Rules of Engagement..... a little snippet.

From an NCO in Kirkuk: You make the wrong move and kill civilians though, you not only have to live with the mistake, but you will be ridiculed unmercifully by the media/big army. You will be buried in proceedings and paperwork the remainder of your deployment, and you will not be the same. Your buddies will be affected as well. Cpl. X will see how bad it could be to make the wrong decision, and will hesitate just a hair too long when there is a real threat… and more men will die. The fear of failure leads to hesitation, and hesitation in war is a lesser form of suicide.
16 posted on 07/12/2008 8:57:33 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene

So care to venture a prediction? Court martial or dismissal?


17 posted on 07/12/2008 9:31:35 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson