Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor
Why would an inter-Iraq or even a Middle Eastern regional call need to transit a U.S. switch?

In this instance, would US forces in theater be able to surveil(?) cell/satellite communications specific to the situation at hand, or would all communications in that area have to be intercepted and routed to the US to be electronically searched for the information needed, thereby transiting a US switch?

Not being a wise@$$, just seeking info.

181 posted on 07/14/2008 5:49:05 AM PDT by Roccus (I love my country...the government is another story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Roccus
would all communications in that area have to be intercepted and routed to the US to be electronically searched for the information needed, thereby transiting a US switch?

Technically, no. You ask the Kuwaiti and Egyptian companies to install the proper gear. Having gained that cooperation there is no need to route it to the U.S. And if you DID choose to route it, you's still need that same cooperation. There's no avoiding it.

Again the story makes no sense. Three Middle Eastern cellphone companies/carriers (now two due to consolidation), handling calls inside Iraq. There is no plausible reason why these calls would be "routed" to any U.S. domestic entity or domestic gear.

182 posted on 07/14/2008 6:07:32 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson