Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RetiredNavy

I’ve never had an MRI or CAT and haven’t had any but dental X-Rays in 20 years. So MRI tech is relatively unknown to me.

I knew an MRI was dangerous in the presence of ferrous materials, but that’s about it...

If they have metal detecting equipment, then they should use it and just eat the false alerts, what’s the use of having security equipment if you ignore it?


88 posted on 07/11/2008 10:18:40 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Dr.Zoidberg
The issue is one of complacency. When it goes off for every patient, soon people, even those that know better, tend to ignore the warning. We have also noticed that, over time, people tend to depend on the detectors for screening and the investigation and questioning process becomes a sometimes thing.

We have found that a much better process is to require a standardized questionnaire, consistent questioning, and if in doubt, investigation of specific types of implants to determine MRI compatibility. If there is ANY doubt whatsoever, that patient gets another type of study.

95 posted on 07/11/2008 6:13:11 PM PDT by RetiredNavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson