To: RedRover; xzins; jazusamo
I'm with Jaz on this, this fiasco should be nipped in the bud during the Art.32 hearing. There's been enough of this trumped up nonsense by overzealous, even seemingly vindictive prosecutors. NO MORE!!!
To: smoothsailing; RedRover; xzins; jazusamo; Girlene
I'm with Jaz on this, this fiasco should be nipped in the bud during the Art.32 hearing. There's been enough of this trumped up nonsense by overzealous, even seemingly vindictive prosecutors. NO MORE!!! Daydreaming ... ...
What would happen if all of these Marines, once cleared through dropping the charges or adjudication, brought their own UCMJ Sub Chapter X claims for:
- 81. Conspiracy.
- 91. Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer.
- 97. Unlawful detention.
- 99. Misbehavior before the enemy.
- 104. Aiding the enemy.
- 107. False official statements.
- 117. Provoking speeches or gestures.
- 131. Perjury.
- 132. Frauds against the United States.
- 133. Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman.
- 134. General Article.
Since they are so well versed in piling on charges, that should cover just about everything, and with me on a jury would be a slam-dunk on at least #132 and #133.
Thanks for the info, Red and all.
18 posted on
07/10/2008 12:06:02 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson