Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fannie, Freddie insolvent, Poole tells Bloomberg
Reuters ^ | Thursday July 10, 8:58 am ET

Posted on 07/10/2008 7:07:50 AM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: count-your-change
No one is going to touch the country’s favorite couple, Freddie and Fannie or crimp their style. Just ain’t gonna happen.

It probably shouldn't happen. These are the only government programs that turn people into Republicans. People who own their own homes are far more likely to vote GOP. Compared to the dough taxpayers shell out to create more Democrats, this is chump change.


21 posted on 07/10/2008 11:49:45 AM PDT by Nick Danger (www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Agreed, ultimately a lower dollar. It could lead to stagflation. Lower dollar and recession at the same time. Last time Volker’s medicine didn’t taste so good, now it will be more like Chemotherapy.


22 posted on 07/10/2008 11:52:22 AM PDT by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Zip

ping


23 posted on 07/10/2008 8:24:06 PM PDT by zip (((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Um, lets try again. A very large quasi private entity has been spectacularly mismanaged by political apointees with little or no background that would allow them to successfully manage said entity.

Now, it is in very bad shape, and politicians are suggesting that the taxpayers take over the firms. This would add 5 Trillion dollars to our debt, according to another article linked on drudge this AM. If only 10% of their debt is bad, we, the taxpayers would get stuck with a $150 billion check to cover.

The cost of the Iraq war. But of course it could be 15% or 20%, we just don’t know.

I would say that among all the idiotic things that politicians have done this is probably the most expensive, and so one of the worst.

It’s not class envy that makes me mad, its favoritism, nepotism and they resulting massive costs to taxpayers.


24 posted on 07/11/2008 9:11:51 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
We all have to pick our battles. You take the one about getting politicians to stop subsidizing home ownership, and I'll work on RKBA or taxes. Run the math, Nick, baby! Taxes are going to need to go up to cover this bailout. A LOT!
25 posted on 07/11/2008 9:14:34 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
We all have to pick our battles. You take the one about getting politicians to stop subsidizing home ownership, and I'll work on RKBA or taxes. Run the math, Nick, baby! Taxes are going to need to go up to cover this bailout. A LOT!
26 posted on 07/11/2008 9:14:42 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Nick wrote:It probably shouldn't happen. These are the only government programs that turn people into Republicans. People who own their own homes are far more likely to vote GOP. Compared to the dough taxpayers shell out to create more Democrats, this is chump change.

Stupid big government programs are bad, even if they might help the GOP. I'm a conservative first and GOP partisan second.

Section 8 housing is about $10 billion a year. If we the taxpayers only get stuck with a 10% write down that's $150 billion. NOT HARDLY CHUMP CHANGE. 15 TIMES bigger than a flagship social welfare program (that I hate).

Big Government Conservatisms at it's most wasteful.

27 posted on 07/11/2008 9:20:10 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
It’s not class envy that makes me mad, its favoritism, nepotism and
they resulting massive costs to taxpayers.


No kidding.

I respect Dubya for all he's done to fight back against the Islamo-nuts.
And getting a couple of good guys onto the USSC.

But I was wondering what would be the outcome of his endless mantra
about getting as many Americans as possible into home ownership.

Now we are going to live with the bitter fruits of that well-intended
and horribly mis-managed enterprise.
Dubya ain't the one that committed the massive frauds...but I
do wonder if, to some degree, he passively didn't exercise
more oversight by not using his bully pulpit to advocate PRUDENT
financial approaches to home ownership.
28 posted on 07/11/2008 9:26:59 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
spectacularly mismanaged by political apointees with little or no background that would allow them to successfully manage said entity

You would have more credibility if the stuff you said was true. I just looked up the backgrounds of all of the key officers of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. For you to say that any of these people have "little or no background that would allow them to successfully manage said entity" marks you as someone who either has no clue who these people are, or does know who they are and is lying to us on purpose. Every one of these people is an accomplished, experienced executive.

Rant away, but please don't lie to us.


29 posted on 07/11/2008 12:04:28 PM PDT by Nick Danger (www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Every one of these people is an accomplished, experienced executive.

Yes, after the house cleaning. Jamie Gorelick on there? Is she your idea of an "accomplished experienced executive". Her last "executive" job got us a firewall that helped prevent CIA and FBI from communicating with each other in the Clinton Justice department. A contributing factor in 9/11. Then, showing that her real executive expertise was damage control she was a donk appointment to the 9/11 commission itself, an tribunal she should have been a witness for. Stunning abuse of power. Awesome track record as Clintonista sock puppet. Experience as a finance exec. ZERO.

30 posted on 07/11/2008 3:17:54 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’m just curious, who came up with these names anyway? Sounds like a stereotypical black couple from the South.


31 posted on 07/11/2008 3:23:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (BARACK OBAMA WILL SAVE US! HE HAS RISEN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Apparently, the two names are acronyms - for Federal Realty Mortgage Exchange ... all words like that.

In the Australian media, they have to constantly explain the two names of these important institutions, and also say that they ARE institutions, and not two individuals. To foreigners, the names seem quite funny. But once the implications of a Federal bailout, and a collapse of the dollar, are explained, then suddenly everyone stops laughing.


32 posted on 07/15/2008 6:57:22 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson