Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom

I may not have agreed with Ed some time on may issues, I respect the man for his ability to speak his mind and stick to it and the reasons behind it. Sounds like a good idea, don’t think it will be anything close to conservative but anything right now would be an improvement


5 posted on 07/09/2008 6:02:06 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (IF YOU ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE BY 35 YOU HAVE NO BRAIN. W CHURCHILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ronnie raygun
Ditto. He's also the only politician that ever replied to a letter I wrote him with a personal response that referenced my own letter.

(It was about some question he didn't understand on Church teaching that he mentioned as an aside to a caller on his WABC radio show, probably early 90s.)

8 posted on 07/09/2008 6:12:07 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Teachers open the door. It's up to you to enter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ronnie raygun

To be fair and not create a center party of fickle swing voting politicians it would be better to divide the political spectrum into 4 parties, not 3. From left to right the top vote getters would likely be the Socialists, Democrats, Republicans, and Conservatives. A law that reserved a small but equal fraction of the seats to the top 4 vote getting parties might induce that. Or a public campaign finance law that granted equal amounts to the 4 top parties would help. I’m not a fan of public financing but we need some incentive. Monopolies of any kind are bad and duopolies not much better.


12 posted on 07/09/2008 6:34:20 PM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson