Yeah, I have to say that the note screams involvement by the family in the coverup. One thing everyone can agree on is that the lengthy note was written after the fact to make it look like a botched kidnapping. The reference to 118,000, SBTC, “and hence” sentence structure, and the fact that Patsy didn’t even hesitate to call family and friends as well is all enough to give one pause. It’s certainly not hard to see why certain people think Patsy was involved. I’d say the repitition of this particular DNA sample is enough to prove involvement by an outside party, but that alone shouldn’t exhonerate the family from the coverup. Let’s not forget that the first time this DNA was sampled it was in a mixed blood sample on Benet’s underwear, not in an area where contact was only assumed - that one hit might have been a mistake, but to find it again on two other spots of a different piece of clothing? That screams outside involvement.
And the 9/11 hang up call several days prior to JB’s death ... from the Ramsey home.
The note certainly was very suspicious for serveral very good reasons: The amount of ransom; the way it was written looked like how I'd imagine someone would try to cover something up; that it was written on the Ramsey's notepad with their pen; that a practice note was written, etc.
I read that in the a.m. Patsy was wearing the same clothes that she had on the evening before. If true, this is a huge red flag! Also, they apparently had a falling out with the friends who they had dinner with the night of her death, and who also was with them when the body was found. Not evidence in itself, but it all makes you wonder. Without the foreign DNA it would be virtually impossible for me to believe it was someone else. FWIW, foreign DNA was found on her long ago. I believe on her underwear and her body. Regardless of all of the facts and conjecture, it's a horrible thing all the way around.