“WRONG all 22 are either employed by EADS or NG. and they had to retract there newspaper ad.”
Funny, but in post 133 you claimed it was only 12.
“And no the KC-45 is not better. The KC-767 scored higher on what counts.”
Boeing didn’t offer the KC-767 for the competition, they offered the non-existant KC-767AT (Advanced Tanker)
that is based on the equally non-existant 767-200LRF.
So how could a non-existant aircraft “score higher on what counts” than an aircraft that is already flying?
Read the RFP
Need not say anymore
WRONG all 22 are either employed by EADS or NG. and they had to retract there newspaper ad.”
Funny, but in post 133 you claimed it was only 12.
Does it matter they lied and got caught. typical EADS deceptions.
Boeing didn’t offer the KC-767 for the competition, they offered the non-existant KC-767AT (Advanced Tanker)
that is based on the equally non-existant 767-200LRF.
So how could a non-existant aircraft “score higher on what counts” than an aircraft that is already flying?
What ever. They bib a KC-767 it made the grade were it counted the KC-30 DID NOT