Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djwright

“It isn’t a government subsidy if you get a product for the money.”

It IS a government subsidy if the money is spent to keep the production line of an OBSOLETE aircraft running.

Boeing has been talking for years about closing the 767 line to concentrate on 787 production IF there were no orders for the 767 to fill beyond 2007. UPS ordered a bunch of freighters, so now the projected line closure is in 2015.


257 posted on 07/20/2008 6:22:08 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats: Supporting America's enemies since 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: 2CAVTrooper
Then I guess you and I disagree on what a subsidy is.

So the USAF would be subsidizing the A330 production line after the A350 comes out.

In reality the commercially successful 767 (almost 1000 units built) will be subsidizing the USAF, who will get a protein airframe and not have to pay the full development cost (about $10B in current dollars).

258 posted on 07/20/2008 6:58:20 PM PDT by djwright (I know who's my daddy, do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: 2CAVTrooper

UPS ordered a bunch of freighters, so now the projected line closure is in 2015

Yep they canceled there Airbust orders smart customer.

as for Tanker Blogs Wars no they are not funded by Boeing they are independent. They are FOr a American Airplane that can do the Job as requested in the RFP not a turd that cannot IE KC-30 a330MRTT. which has many issues that make it not a useable tanker.


262 posted on 07/20/2008 10:07:27 PM PDT by cmdr straker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson