Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

All of what you mention sounds very scientific, but I believe most of what you quote is based on skeletal remains and much of it has been debunked. But again, its all conjecture, none of it has been proven according to scientific method.

I’m off to exercise my body-need to rest my brain.

Enjoyed the conversation.


105 posted on 07/09/2008 7:14:05 AM PDT by TexasKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: TexasKate
...but I believe most of what you quote is based on skeletal remains and much of it has been debunked.

You believe incorrectly.

Fundamentalists tend to deny or ignore what they find inconvenient to their religious beliefs, and their writings are full of this kind of thing.

That they find it convenient to deny or ignore such findings does not make them go away, not does it "debunk" them. To do that requires real science.

If you should have any questions on the different species of fossil man that were mention in the previous post, let me know. Maybe I can help explain things a bit.

107 posted on 07/09/2008 7:26:59 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: TexasKate
All of what you mention sounds very scientific, but I believe most of what you quote is based on skeletal remains and much of it has been debunked.

Debunked by who?

But again, its all conjecture, none of it has been proven according to scientific method.

Thousands of scientists would disagree with that statement.

109 posted on 07/09/2008 7:28:32 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson