Yes, we've seen the dangers of supposing life to be susceptible to Intelligent Design....
Anything that creates doubt about evolution is ok with me.
Just wait until the population explosion. You’ll be sorry, you doubter you.
John G. West is an idiot.
I'd make a small bet that, even in Louisiana, there are more science teachers willing to preach atheism than ID.
Anyway, congratulations to Louisiana! May the intellectual dam of Darwinism burst wide open.
There is a correlation between low fat/high carb diets and the current diabetes epidemic. You'd think that such a correlation would be of interest to scientists. The public has been out ahead (at least a decade or two) of the medical community on this one.
There is a correlation between low fat/high carb diets and the current diabetes epidemic. You'd think that such a correlation would be of interest to scientists. The public has been out ahead (at least a decade or two) of the medical community on this one.
Excellent link to the MetS article; completely coincides with the personal experience of Mrs. GB - high BMI, and PCOS that proved to be largely unresponsive to traditional infertility treatments.
3 children later, we have found the “secret cure” to infertility: serious CHO restriction. Since puberty, she was fortunate to be fertile once per year at best. Within two weeks of severe CHO restriction, normal fertility ‘appeared’. Month after month.
Now the issue is how many children are too many to have? Its a much better problem to have, trust me.
Students need to know about the current scientific consensus on a given issue, but they also need to be able to evaluate critically the evidence on which that consensus rests.
So when teachers teach that creation "science" and intelligent design are fundamentalist religious propaganda dishonestly masquerading as science they will be protected by this new law.
Talk about unintended consequences!
I am so pleased to hear this!
This is the exact opposite of the truth. The point of eugenics is to defeat natural selection, which eugenicists hubristically imagine they are able to do.
steve-b is quite right to point out (in post 2) that eugenics is a form of intelligent design. Not intelligent enough, you say? Exactly: nothing and nobody is intelligent enough. The believer need not dispute this; I have said before that omniscience is not a high level of intelligence, but a different concept altogether.
I wonder how long it will be until some kid challenges the “dogma” of mathematics, and argues that it’s unfair to say there is only one right answer.