Replies

If I respond to your inaccurate portrayal of your unbelievable insensitivity on a previous thread then you'll hit the abuse button for carrying on a feud. So you see no matter what I do or say, you'll call for help.

I was offering an example of how you seem to mischaracterize things. I have not hit the abuse button on anyone on this thread.

I and a few others are the only ones who have actually discussed the issue at hand. But call that mischaracterization all you want.

I've discussed it plenty. I believe that endangering our troops in ANY WAY simply to satisfy the desires of less than 4% of the population is idiotic.

Now I'll predict your next reply: Take every word I've said on the thread and parse it and show how I'm rally a homo-activist, liberal, DU troll, re-tread, undercover liberal.

No, I find it something of a waste of time to point out the obvious.

I think I actually saw an opinion on point in this post.

Homosexuals have been in every military that we know of, have they not? And we lost all of those wars because of it? Please explain the endangering part.

Maybe take the war in the Pacific or some other campaign and explain how many deaths and injuries were caused by homosexuals presence in the military.