Don't quote the policy to me. I cited it earlier. I've been reading here since 1998. Your attempt to call the gendarmes is hiding behind the fact that you have no good argument.
If a political party has 20 planks in their platform and you agree with one or two of them, that does not mean you support the platform.
Challenging me to find that article has nothing to do with my position or the discussion here. It's fluff you have thrown in as if it has some relevance to make you're position less weak than it is.
When you respond to me, as I know you will, take your best shot. I don't like you or your style, so I won't come back at you.
I have no idea what you are talking about, is there a question in there?
Don't quote the policy to me. I cited it earlier. I've been reading here since 1998. Your attempt to call the gendarmes is hiding behind the fact that you have no good argument.
You didn't cite ANY policy. Your attempted statement of "policy" is refuted by this very thread. I pinged a person who you referred to but did not have the courtesy to ping and I also pinged my "Homosexual Agenda" ping list. Are you trying to tell me that it is not my prerogative to ping one of my ping lists when it is pertinent to the list? As far you "reading here since 1998" statement, so have a lot of leftists.
When you respond to me, as I know you will, take your best shot. I don't like you or your style, so I won't come back at you.
I don't know where you got the impression that I cared one bit whether or not you like me; however, you couldn't be more wrong.